On “Taste, Smell and Touch of a REAL Book”

While I was discussing something about free ebooks available on the internet, some of the responses I received was the perceived tendency against e-reading was because you don’t get the same feel or smell as a “real” book. “E-books and audiobooks shouldn’t be called books,” many had said to me.

You don’t experience the book if you don’t touch it and it is not a REAL book if it wasn’t on paper.

Well, this is the short history of books and the evolution of literature :

As you can see, the only thing similar to it was the written words. All of them can be classified as reading materials or books depending on the age you’re in. But point is, the change was accessibility and convenience. The evolution of reading materials that surpass it’s limitation was the one that made literacy flourish in this age or we’re still reduced to the limitations of oral literature and the ability to read was again rendered insignificant in our daily life.

Most of my frustration with the idea of disowning e-book format for not being a version of a book was this tendency to take reading for granted.

For Local (Munnelly)Again, you’re taking your ability to read for granted by selectively thinking that the physicality of the material (format, the feel of a paper, the look of it, the smell of it) was worth more than its content. It was also like shaming those with inability to appreciate a proper hardcover book beneath them.

I was raised with a hunger of knowledge. I wasn’t raised to be materialistic with it. I like that reading have given me an ability to reach more sources of information than the limitations I was given as a person. I became addicted to reading not because I like the taste or smell of touch of a book. I read because I can’t stop reading.

And it made me disappointed that many who called themselves book lovers can’t seem to consider themselves as readers of words.

I am certain a lot folks with a form of sight disability that they couldn’t appreciate printed words existed in average book format would think reading was a hassle for them. As if it wasn’t enough, audiobooks wasn’t available as easily as normal printed books and that even cheapest paperback always printed in small sized font that made reading exhausting for them that they quit all together. We all eventually will grow old and suffer ageing.

Why do we still insist on this short term appreciation of a printed book? There are thousands of them and it come with all form and format. Printed books can be yellowed, dirtied, flooded, worn, destroyed, pulped and land-filled. And most importantly, not everyone can afford ALL of them.

I love physical books myself but since I am a writer, I appreciate a blank notebook than I do with printed books. I have a fetish with completely blank unlined books. It’s not about the feel or the smell either. It is just the only thing “new” in electronic form can’t replicate was the gorgeous plain possibility of a blank book. 


Which also why in Markus Zusak’s The Book Thief the scene where Max painted the pages of a book white for Liesel seems more poignant to me.



I love words. I see beauty in words. I love the smell of a fresh new plain book when I broke through the plastic but I love the blankness of it more than I do with most of the books I have in my own library. I live to write. Its a form of expression that I love more than just saying everything out loud.

I just wish being a book lover means more than just owning the physicality of the material so you can enjoy its feels than its content.



2 thoughts on “On “Taste, Smell and Touch of a REAL Book”

  1. Love the written word? Love to write? Go back and learn proper grammar and spelling, then it might make sense. “A hunger of knowledge”? “reading have given me”? “certain a lot folks”? “it come with all form”? “ageing”? Either you haven’t learned proper English format or you are one of the tech addicts who can be witnessed hurrying so quickly through everything that they don’t real realize their ignorance of dropping words, improper abbreviations, misspellings and lack of punctuation and tense usage.

    1. I use British English spelling because my ESL education was based on that but within this blog I use relatively casual Malaysian English which may sound strange to you but Malaysian English do not follow American styles and we generally aren’t so tightwad about it. American English is just as riddled with grammatical errors, spelling errors and punctuation errors when compared to Standard English.

      Its obvious that you don’t have anything to add to the post and its contents and instead of having your own opinion on the subject matter, you choose to be deluded to the fact that people are willing to listen to your very unhelpful grammatical rant.

      I suspect you might be one of the authors I’ve reviewed negatively and somehow you think it ruined your ego and you decide to convey your rage in anonymity. I would suggest a much healthier alternative which was to find someone, preferably a psychiatrist and medications because you’re giving me OCD signs and symptoms and I’m worried about you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s